Reading time: 3 minutes
The discussion on the transition to emission-free, electric equipment is gaining momentum in the construction industry. But the question remains: how well informed are construction professionals about these sustainable alternatives really? The Boels Rental Construction Index* has explored this issue and offers insight into the perception of electric equipment and its usage within the industry. Glenn Verburg, Director Fleet Procurement at Boels Groep, shares the five most common myths and facts.
1. There is not enough charging infrastructure
More than two in five construction professionals (43%) think that the charging infrastructure available is not sufficient enough to allow for effective use of electric equipment.
Fact: Although ensuring the right power connection can pose a challenge, there are more options than commonly expected. When switching to electric equipment at construction sites, it is important to schedule regular recharging sessions as simply refuelling with diesel is no longer an option. For example, equipment can be charged using electricity from the grid during lunch breaks or at night. To prevent a lack of electricity availability during peak hours, peak shaving can provide a solution. This involves charging battery systems during off-peak hours, when the grid has enough capacity. This stored electricity can be used by professionals at peak hours during the day to avoid work interruptions.
43% think that there is insufficient charging infrastructure available
2. Electric equipment is more expensive
38 percent of construction professionals believe electric equipment is more expensive than diesel-powered.
Fact: Although the initial purchase price of electric equipment is often higher, operational costs are generally lower. This is mainly due to the fact that electric equipment requires less maintenance. Costs for maintenance amount to around 3 percent of the total costs compared to 10 percent for diesel equipment. Conventional equipment, for example, requires fuel, filters and oil. When buying new equipment, it is important to look at more than just the purchase price. It is also essential to consider additional costs such as energy consumption, maintenance, and insurance.
believe that electric-powered equipment is less powerful than diesel-powered
3. Electric equipment is less powerful
Almost one in three construction professionals (31%) believe that electric-powered equipment is less powerful than diesel-powered.
Myth: Advances in modern technology mean that batteries for electric equipment are becoming more powerful and lasting longer. One advantage is that electric equipment only consumes energy when it is actually being used, which is typically about 4 to 5 hours a day. This is in contrast to diesel models that also consume fuel when idle. Although the market for electric alternatives to diesel equipment is still evolving, electric equipment helps save costs and is better for the environment.
4. Electric equipment can’t be used in every situation
According to 30 percent of construction professionals, electric equipment is not suitable for infrastructure work as this sometimes takes place in remote locations where there are no charging stations. At these locations, it can be difficult to provide adequate power facilities.
Fact: Adopting electric equipment in the construction industry is on the rise, even for projects in remote locations. Although the lack of nearby charging stations does pose a challenge, there are now smart solutions available. Large batteries capable of providing long-term energy in combination with mobile charging stations powered by solar energy are enabling electric equipment to be charged directly at the work site. Despite these advances, every construction company has to weigh logistical feasibility against their sustainable ambitions.
5. All equipment is available in electric form
A remarkable one-quarter of construction professionals (24%) think there is an electric alternative for every piece of equipment.
Myth: Although electric and hybrid models are undergoing rapid development, the reality is that a lot of equipment does not yet have an electric equivalent, especially in the heavy-duty categories. This includes, for example, bulldozers for construction and demolition work. Manufacturers are working diligently on developing these models, but for the time being, Stage V diesel options often remain the cleanest option. This is especially true when this equipment runs on biodiesel such as HVO100, which produces significantly lower emissions than standard diesel.
*This survey was conducted by Markteffect among 404 Dutch people who work in the construction industry.
